Keyword summary
⁠0%4 analyzed articles/videos1,060 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Berkley Riverfront results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Biased Writer Voice, and Anecdotal, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 944 hits. Analysis detected 7,013 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,497 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠11% (31,302 of 35,184 keywords). This Berkley Riverfront is better (less manipulative) than 89.00% of the peer group.
Berkley Riverfront
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠0%Javian Hawkins1%
⁠0%Atlanta Falcons1%
⁠0%Anthony Romano1%
⁠11%Berkley Riverfront (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 12,497
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

11% percentile
025507510011.0% percentile
1.6% BS Score4 analyzed articles12.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 5.4%5.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos