Keyword summary
⁠13%1 analyzed article/video2,007 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Belle Meade Historic Site And Winery results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 4.6% saturation with 371 hits. Analysis detected 2,935 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,028 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of ⁠5% (52,606 of 55,316 keywords). This Belle Meade Historic Site And Winery is better (less manipulative) than 95.10% of the peer group.
Belle Meade Historic Site And Winery
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Property Transfers1%
⁠0%Madison Township1%
⁠0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
⁠0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
⁠0%Paul Demark1%
⁠5%Belle Meade Historic Site And Winery (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 8,028
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

5% percentile
02550751004.9% percentile
1.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos