Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video567 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Belift Lab results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Optimism Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 266 hits. Analysis detected 1,273 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,268 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (20,691 of 37,536 keywords). This Belift Lab is better (less manipulative) than 55.10% of the peer group.
Belift Lab
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠45%Belift Lab (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,268
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

45% percentile
025507510044.9% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 8.9%8.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 11.7%11.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 11.7%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 0.8%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 0.5%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos