Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 494 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Belgium Football results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Halo Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 30.1% saturation with 594 hits . Analysis detected 2,387 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,976 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of 78% (8,568 of 37,536 keywords). This Belgium Football is worse (more manipulative) than 77.20% of the peer group. Belgium Football
Keyword details
Total words: 1,976
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
77% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 77.2% percentile 4.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 28.1% 28.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 11.6% 11.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 30.1% 30.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Horn Effect Sitewide 1.0% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Keyword 30.1%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 28.1%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 6.0% Horn Effect: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 1.0% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.4% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.6% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst