Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video395 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Beefalo results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Representativeness Heuristic, and Anchoring Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 7.7% saturation with 122 hits. Analysis detected 1,014 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,580 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 38% (23,483 of 37,313 keywords). This Beefalo is better (less manipulative) than 62.90% of the peer group.
Beefalo
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
38%Beefalo (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,580
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

37% percentile
025507510037.1% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.3%5.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.4%Middle Ground: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.1%No True Scotsman: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.1%Composition/Division: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos