Keyword summary
35% 1 analyzed article/video 651 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bear Encounters results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Indoctrination , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 161 hits . Analysis detected 1,310 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,953 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 35% (23,877 of 36,750 keywords). This Bear Encounters is better (less manipulative) than 65.00% of the peer group. Bear Encounters
Keyword details
Total words: 1,953
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 35.0% percentile 2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 0.8% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Special Pleading: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.3% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst