Keyword summary
21%1 analyzed article/video1,640 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bathrooms results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Anecdotal, with Burden of Proof as the most egregious example at 7% saturation with 344 hits. Analysis detected 2,227 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,920 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 14% (32,480 of 37,536 keywords). This Bathrooms is better (less manipulative) than 86.50% of the peer group.
Bathrooms
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
14%Bathrooms (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,920
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

14% percentile
025507510013.5% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Keyword 7.0%7.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 5.0%5.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%Burden of Proof: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 0.4%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.1%Red Herring: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.7%No True Scotsman: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos