Keyword summary
61%1 analyzed article/video2,100 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Basil Bunting results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Confirmation Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 949 hits. Analysis detected 5,058 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,300 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 29% (26,890 of 37,536 keywords). This Basil Bunting is better (less manipulative) than 71.60% of the peer group.
Basil Bunting
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
29%Basil Bunting (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 6,300
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

28% percentile
025507510028.4% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 15.1%15.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.2%2.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 15.1%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Begging the Question: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos