Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Barbara Walters results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Unattributed Quote , and Negativity Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 16.4% saturation with 270 hits . Analysis detected 846 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,644 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Barbara Walters is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Barbara Walters
Keyword details
Total words: 1,644
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 16.4% 16.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 9.3% 9.3% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 19.2% Halo Effect: Keyword 16.4%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 1.1% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.0% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.8% Horn Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst