Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,092 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Banned Books results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 535 hits . Analysis detected 3,326 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,368 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 40% (22,804 of 37,536 keywords). This Banned Books is better (less manipulative) than 60.80% of the peer group. Banned Books
Keyword details
Total words: 4,368
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
39% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 39.2% percentile 2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.3% 8.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.3% 12.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.8% 9.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst