Keyword summary
5%4 analyzed articles/videos6,893 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bag Policy results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Optimism Bias, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 2,243 hits. Analysis detected 13,294 faulty-reasoning hits from 33,548 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 3% (34,725 of 35,650 keywords). This Bag Policy is better (less manipulative) than 97.40% of the peer group.
Bag Policy
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
3%Bag Policy (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 33,548
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

3% percentile
02550751002.6% percentile
1.2% BS Score4 analyzed articles33.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 6.7%6.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.5%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate