Keyword summary
93%1 analyzed article/video717 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Backfired Tactics results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Availability Heuristic, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 40.7% saturation with 876 hits. Analysis detected 2,999 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,151 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.3% and a BS Rank of 88% (4,716 of 37,536 keywords). This Backfired Tactics is worse (more manipulative) than 87.40% of the peer group.
Backfired Tactics
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
88%Backfired Tactics (selected)7%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,151
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

87% percentile
025507510087.4% percentile
6.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 40.7%40.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 10.3%10.3%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Keyword 8.3%8.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 9.2%9.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 5.0%5.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Anecdotal: Keyword 40.7%, sitewide 5.2%Framing Effect: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 20.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 1.4%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.4%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.9%No True Scotsman: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.1%AnecdotalSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos