Keyword summary
56% 1 analyzed article/video 1,831 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bab Al Mandeb results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21% saturation with 1,155 hits . Analysis detected 3,523 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,493 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 40% (20,894 of 34,417 keywords). This Bab Al Mandeb is better (less manipulative) than 60.70% of the peer group. Bab Al Mandeb
Keyword details
Total words: 5,493
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
39% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 39.3% percentile 2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 21.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 1.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.0% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.8% Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.5% Composition/Division: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst