Keyword summary
ā 91% 1 analyzed article/video 895 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Avengers Endgame results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Hindsight Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 46.1% saturation with 1,239 hits . Analysis detected 4,076 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,685 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of ā 77% (8,668 of 37,343 keywords). This Avengers Endgame is worse (more manipulative) than 76.80% of the peer group. Avengers Endgame
Keyword details
Total words: 2,685
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
77% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 76.8% percentile 4.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 46.1% 46.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 14.3% 14.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 17.8% 17.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 13.4% 13.4% Sunk Cost Effect Sitewide 0.3% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 46.1%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.4%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 17.8%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 14.3%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 0.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst