Keyword summary
⁠89%1 analyzed article/video474 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Avatar Legends The Fighting Game results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Biased Writer Voice, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 34.7% saturation with 494 hits. Analysis detected 1,955 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,422 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6% and a BS Rank of ⁠87% (5,194 of 37,530 keywords). This Avatar Legends The Fighting Game is worse (more manipulative) than 86.20% of the peer group.
Avatar Legends The Fighting Game
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠87%Avatar Legends The Fighting Game (selected)6%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,422
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

86% percentile
025507510086.2% percentile
6.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 34.7%34.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 11.7%11.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 11.6%11.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Personal IncredulitySitewide 0.2%Keyword 5.6%5.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 5.9%5.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 6.1%6.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Keyword 34.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 15.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 11.7%, sitewide 1.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 2.7%Personal Incredulity: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 0.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Composition/Division: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.2%Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.9%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.3%Special Pleading: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.3%Burden of Proof: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.4%Negativity BiasSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos