Keyword summary
67% 2 analyzed articles/videos 4,469 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Autocrats results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 23.4% saturation with 3,579 hits . Analysis detected 20,080 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,300 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 56% (16,544 of 37,536 keywords). This Autocrats is worse (more manipulative) than 55.90% of the peer group. Autocrats
Keyword details
Total words: 15,300
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
56% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 55.9% percentile 3.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles15.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 23.4% 23.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.4% 6.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 12.3% 12.3% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 15.6% 15.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 23.4%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 0.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 2.0% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst