Keyword summary
67%2 analyzed articles/videos4,469 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Autocrats results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 23.4% saturation with 3,579 hits. Analysis detected 20,080 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,300 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 56% (16,544 of 37,536 keywords). This Autocrats is worse (more manipulative) than 55.90% of the peer group.
Autocrats
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
56%Autocrats (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 15,300
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

56% percentile
025507510055.9% percentile
3.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles15.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 23.4%23.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.4%6.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.7%2.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 12.3%12.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 7.0%7.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 15.6%15.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 23.4%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 0.0%Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 2.0%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos