Keyword summary
93% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,200 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Auto Theft results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 35.8% saturation with 1,287 hits . Analysis detected 6,874 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,600 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.2% and a BS Rank of 87% (4,934 of 37,533 keywords). This Auto Theft is worse (more manipulative) than 86.90% of the peer group. Auto Theft
Keyword details
Total words: 3,600
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
87% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 86.9% percentile 6.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 15.4% 15.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 19.7% 19.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 35.8% 35.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 17.2% 17.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 14.8% 14.8% Red Herring Sitewide 0.7% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 35.8%, sitewide 26.9% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 19.7%, sitewide 7.5% Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 17.2%, sitewide 11.1% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 15.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 15.4%, sitewide 3.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Ad Hominem: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 6.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 1.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.3% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 1.4% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 4.6% Red Herring: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 0.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Straw Man: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst