Keyword summary
93%2 analyzed articles/videos1,200 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Auto Theft results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 35.8% saturation with 1,287 hits. Analysis detected 6,874 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,600 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.2% and a BS Rank of 87% (4,934 of 37,533 keywords). This Auto Theft is worse (more manipulative) than 86.90% of the peer group.
Auto Theft
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
87%Auto Theft (selected)7%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,600
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

87% percentile
025507510086.9% percentile
6.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 15.4%15.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 19.7%19.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 35.8%35.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 17.2%17.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 14.8%14.8%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 5.3%5.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 5.4%5.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 35.8%, sitewide 26.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 19.7%, sitewide 7.5%Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 17.2%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 15.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 15.4%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Ad Hominem: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 6.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 1.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 1.4%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 4.6%Red Herring: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 0.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Straw Man: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate