Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,033 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Auto Insurance results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 14% saturation with 578 hits . Analysis detected 5,396 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,132 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 64% (13,618 of 37,536 keywords). This Auto Insurance is worse (more manipulative) than 63.70% of the peer group. Auto Insurance
Keyword details
Total words: 4,132
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
64% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 63.7% percentile 3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.8% 10.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 14.0% 14.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 12.1% 12.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.4% 8.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Genetic Fallacy Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 15.9% Ad Hominem: Keyword 14.0%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 3.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 7.5% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 1.4% In-Group Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 5.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Special Pleading: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst