Keyword summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 582 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Australia Japan Relations results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Overconfidence Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 32.6% saturation with 562 hits . Analysis detected 2,884 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,724 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.3% and a BS Rank of 90% (3,526 of 34,916 keywords). This Australia Japan Relations is worse (more manipulative) than 89.90% of the peer group. Australia Japan Relations
Keyword details
Total words: 1,724
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
90% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 89.9% percentile 7.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 26.5% 26.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 19.7% 19.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 12.3% 12.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 32.6% 32.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 8.1% 8.1% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 32.6%, sitewide 26.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 26.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 19.7%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 15.9% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 4.6% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 8.1% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 4.0% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 3.3% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 6.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 1.1% Begging the Question: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 1.7% Primacy Effect: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 0.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst