Keyword summary
13%1 analyzed article/video2,026 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Austin Parks And Recreation results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.6% saturation with 1,072 hits. Analysis detected 3,955 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,078 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 46% (18,916 of 34,933 keywords). This Austin Parks And Recreation is better (less manipulative) than 54.10% of the peer group.
Austin Parks And Recreation
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
46%Austin Parks And Recreation (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 6,078
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

46% percentile
025507510045.9% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 8.4%8.4%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 17.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Horn Effect: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.4%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.5%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.0%, sitewide 0.8%Burden of Proof: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos