Keyword summary
⁠68%1 analyzed article/video1,013 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Austin City Limits Music Festival results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Anecdotal, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 18.5% saturation with 563 hits. Analysis detected 2,241 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,039 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (21,003 of 37,536 keywords). This Austin City Limits Music Festival is better (less manipulative) than 56.00% of the peer group.
Austin City Limits Music Festival
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 3,039
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

44% percentile
025507510044.0% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 18.5%18.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 13.9%13.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.2%1.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 18.5%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 13.9%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.1%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.4%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.5%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos