Keyword summary
⁠88%1 analyzed article/video441 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Austin City Council Mobility Committee results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Appeal to Authority, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 152 hits. Analysis detected 1,443 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,323 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠66% (13,013 of 37,536 keywords). This Austin City Council Mobility Committee is worse (more manipulative) than 65.30% of the peer group.
Austin City Council Mobility Committee
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 1,323
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

65% percentile
025507510065.3% percentile
3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 10.8%10.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 9.5%9.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Keyword 6.3%6.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 7.3%7.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.7%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 1.4%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 6.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 5.2%Bandwagon: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos