Keyword summary
85% 1 analyzed article/video 1,271 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Attention Economy results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Pessimism Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 24.7% saturation with 1,258 hits . Analysis detected 7,681 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,084 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 72% (10,206 of 35,445 keywords). This Attention Economy is worse (more manipulative) than 71.20% of the peer group. Attention Economy
Keyword details
Total words: 5,084
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
71% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 71.2% percentile 4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 23.5% 23.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 24.7% 24.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 8.5% 8.5% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 9.0% 9.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 24.7%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 23.5%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 1.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 3.3% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 4.6% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst