Keyword summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video 858 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Atmospheric Science results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Anecdotal , and Optimism Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 20% saturation with 685 hits . Analysis detected 2,626 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,432 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of â 58% (15,111 of 35,444 keywords). This Atmospheric Science is worse (more manipulative) than 57.40% of the peer group. Atmospheric Science
Keyword details
Total words: 3,432
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 57.4% percentile 3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 20.0% 20.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 11.5% 11.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 8.3% 8.3% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 26.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 20.0%, sitewide 6.7% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 5.2% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 5.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.0% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.8% Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.9% Red Herring: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst