Keyword summary
26%2 analyzed articles/videos1,185 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Astrobiology results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Recency Bias, and Framing Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 418 hits. Analysis detected 2,954 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,271 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 40% (22,650 of 37,536 keywords). This Astrobiology is better (less manipulative) than 60.30% of the peer group.
Astrobiology
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
40%Astrobiology (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,271
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

40% percentile
025507510039.7% percentile
2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.4%0.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 9.8%9.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.4%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.5%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.1%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos