Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video431 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Assassination Threat results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 41.6% saturation with 815 hits. Analysis detected 3,377 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,958 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.5% and a BS Rank of 91% (3,420 of 37,536 keywords). This Assassination Threat is worse (more manipulative) than 90.90% of the peer group.
Assassination Threat
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
91%Assassination Threat (selected)8%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,958
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

91% percentile
025507510090.9% percentile
7.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 41.6%41.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 27.4%27.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 34.1%34.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 15.5%15.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.9%5.9%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Keyword 41.6%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Keyword 34.1%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 27.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 15.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 4.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Horn Effect: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.1%Red Herring: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.4%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos