Keyword summary
55% 1 analyzed article/video 1,429 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Asesores De Lectura results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Halo Effect , and Appeal to Authority , with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 437 hits . Analysis detected 2,597 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,287 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 23% (27,645 of 35,856 keywords). This Asesores De Lectura is better (less manipulative) than 77.10% of the peer group. Asesores De Lectura
Keyword details
Total words: 4,287
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
23% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 22.9% percentile 2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 10.2% 10.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 3.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.4% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst