Keyword summary
35%1 analyzed article/video887 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Artificial Insemination results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Negativity Bias, and Loss Aversion, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 339 hits. Analysis detected 2,759 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,548 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 43% (20,544 of 35,887 keywords). This Artificial Insemination is better (less manipulative) than 57.20% of the peer group.
Artificial Insemination
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
43%Artificial Insemination (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,548
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

43% percentile
025507510042.8% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.8%6.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.9%7.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Keyword 7.2%7.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.9%2.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%Loss Aversion: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 2.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos