Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos823 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Arpa H results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Optimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 39.6% saturation with 1,145 hits. Analysis detected 5,835 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,894 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.8% and a BS Rank of 85% (5,630 of 37,536 keywords). This Arpa H is worse (more manipulative) than 85.00% of the peer group.
Arpa H
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
85%Arpa H (selected)6%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,894
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

85% percentile
025507510085.0% percentile
5.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 18.2%18.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 39.6%39.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.0%9.0%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 11.6%11.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 15.4%15.4%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 10.0%10.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 39.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 18.2%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 16.5%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 15.4%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 11.1%False Dilemma: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 1.5%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 6.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 4.6%Begging the Question: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 0.8%Straw Man: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 0.9%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate