Keyword summary
26%1 analyzed article/video1,385 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Arizona Governor results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Optimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.7% saturation with 633 hits. Analysis detected 4,285 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,259 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 6% (35,606 of 37,536 keywords). This Arizona Governor is better (less manipulative) than 94.90% of the peer group.
Arizona Governor
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
6%Arizona Governor (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 8,259
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

5% percentile
02550751005.1% percentile
1.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles8.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.7%7.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.4%2.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos