Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 736 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Archcity Defenders results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 365 hits . Analysis detected 2,150 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,656 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 31% (26,062 of 37,536 keywords). This Archcity Defenders is better (less manipulative) than 69.40% of the peer group. Archcity Defenders
Keyword details
Total words: 3,656
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
31% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.6% percentile 2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.0% 10.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.7% Straw Man: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst