Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos736 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Archcity Defenders results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 365 hits. Analysis detected 2,150 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,656 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 31% (26,062 of 37,536 keywords). This Archcity Defenders is better (less manipulative) than 69.40% of the peer group.
Archcity Defenders
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
31%Archcity Defenders (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,656
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

31% percentile
025507510030.6% percentile
2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 10.0%10.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.3%2.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.7%1.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.7%Straw Man: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate