Keyword summary
44%1 analyzed article/video3,162 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Aquatic Life results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 802 hits. Analysis detected 7,035 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,486 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 15% (31,190 of 36,701 keywords). This Aquatic Life is better (less manipulative) than 85.00% of the peer group.
Aquatic Life
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
15%Aquatic Life (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 9,486
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

15% percentile
025507510015.0% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles9.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.4%8.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 3.3%3.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos