Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,220 analyzed words
BS Summary: These April Fools Day results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.1% saturation with 251 hits. Analysis detected 1,860 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,880 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠5% (35,930 of 37,536 keywords). This April Fools Day is better (less manipulative) than 95.70% of the peer group.
April Fools Day
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠5%April Fools Day (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,880
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

4% percentile
02550751004.3% percentile
1.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.1%5.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.0%2.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos