Keyword summary
98%1 analyzed article/video181 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Appeasement results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 55.5% saturation with 402 hits. Analysis detected 2,522 faulty-reasoning hits from 724 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 15.1% and a BS Rank of 98% (754 of 37,536 keywords). This Appeasement is worse (more manipulative) than 98.00% of the peer group.
Appeasement
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
98%Appeasement (selected)16%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 724
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

98% percentile
025507510098.0% percentile
15.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles724 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 55.5%55.5%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 49.7%49.7%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 37.6%37.6%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Keyword 17.4%17.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 21.3%21.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 32.7%32.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 10.5%10.5%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Keyword 10.5%10.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.5%7.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 11.6%11.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 55.5%, sitewide 5.3%Ad Hominem: Keyword 49.7%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 37.6%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity Bias: Keyword 32.7%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Keyword 22.2%, sitewide 26.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 21.3%, sitewide 7.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 17.4%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 12.0%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 3.7%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 8.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 0.8%Horn Effect: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 1.0%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 5.2%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Tu Quoque: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos