Keyword summary
⁠52%1 analyzed article/video1,104 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Apparel Brand results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Optimism Bias, and Hindsight Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 305 hits. Analysis detected 2,008 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,416 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠34% (37,074 of 55,511 keywords). This Apparel Brand is better (less manipulative) than 66.80% of the peer group.
Apparel Brand
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Property Transfers1%
⁠0%Madison Township1%
⁠0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
⁠0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
⁠0%Paul Demark1%
⁠34%Apparel Brand (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,416
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

33% percentile
025507510033.2% percentile
1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Keyword 4.0%4.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.4%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 0.3%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.5%Dunning-Kruger Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos