Keyword summary
28%2 analyzed articles/videos2,589 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Appalachia results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Optimism Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 762 hits. Analysis detected 6,404 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,384 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 21% (29,666 of 37,316 keywords). This Appalachia is better (less manipulative) than 79.50% of the peer group.
Appalachia
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
21%Appalachia (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 9,384
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

21% percentile
025507510020.5% percentile
1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.5%7.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate