Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 99 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anomaly results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 57.3% saturation with 177 hits . Analysis detected 547 faulty-reasoning hits from 309 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 19.7% and a BS Rank of 99% (395 of 37,536 keywords). This Anomaly is worse (more manipulative) than 99.00% of the peer group. Anomaly
Keyword details
Total words: 309
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
99% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 99.0% percentile 19.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles309 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 57.3% 57.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 23.3% 23.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 22.6% 22.6% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 12.0% 12.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 14.9% 14.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 12.0% 12.0% Primacy Effect Sitewide 0.9% Keyword 7.4% 7.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 19.7% 19.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Framing Effect: Keyword 57.3%, sitewide 26.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 23.3%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 22.6%, sitewide 11.1% Negativity Bias: Keyword 19.7%, sitewide 19.2% Halo Effect: Keyword 14.9%, sitewide 6.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 12.0%, sitewide 4.0% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 12.0%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 4.6% Primacy Effect: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst