Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,150 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ann Carlson results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Hasty Generalization, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 659 hits. Analysis detected 5,445 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,600 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠63% (13,984 of 37,536 keywords). This Ann Carlson is worse (more manipulative) than 62.70% of the peer group.
Ann Carlson
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠63%Ann Carlson (selected)4%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,600
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

63% percentile
025507510062.7% percentile
3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.1%7.1%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 9.0%9.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 6.8%6.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 6.8%6.8%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 14.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 9.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 0.5%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 6.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 2.0%Halo Effect: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos