Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Animal Welfare League results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Authority , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.5% saturation with 296 hits . Analysis detected 1,940 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,911 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,530 keywords). This Animal Welfare League is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Animal Welfare League
Keyword details
Total words: 1,911
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 7.1% 7.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 15.5% 15.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 6.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 1.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.4% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Personal Incredulity: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst