Keyword summary
42% 4 analyzed articles/videos 1,229 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Animal Cruelty results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Availability Heuristic , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 1,046 hits . Analysis detected 6,974 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,910 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 15% (31,999 of 37,536 keywords). This Animal Cruelty is better (less manipulative) than 85.20% of the peer group. Animal Cruelty
Keyword details
Total words: 9,910
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.8% percentile 1.7% BS Score4 analyzed articles9.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.8% 8.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 10.6% 10.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst