Keyword summary
20% 4 analyzed articles/videos 647 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Animal Control results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 1,327 hits . Analysis detected 10,007 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,168 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 10% (33,175 of 36,716 keywords). This Animal Control is better (less manipulative) than 90.40% of the peer group. Animal Control
Keyword details
Total words: 16,168
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.6% percentile 1.5% BS Score4 analyzed articles16.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.2% 8.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst