Keyword summary
⁠17%2 analyzed articles/videos1,973 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andrew Friedman results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Self-Serving Bias, and In-Group Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 5% saturation with 398 hits. Analysis detected 2,241 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,892 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of ⁠5% (54,163 of 56,762 keywords). This Andrew Friedman is better (less manipulative) than 95.40% of the peer group.
Andrew Friedman
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Property Transfers1%
⁠0%Madison Township1%
⁠0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
⁠0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
⁠0%Paul Demark1%
⁠5%Andrew Friedman (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 7,892
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

5% percentile
02550751004.6% percentile
1.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.6%1.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos