Keyword summary
96% 1 analyzed article/video 624 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andrew Boutros results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Bandwagon , and Ad Hominem , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.3% saturation with 380 hits . Analysis detected 2,730 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,872 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 73% (10,341 of 37,536 keywords). This Andrew Boutros is worse (more manipulative) than 72.50% of the peer group. Andrew Boutros
Keyword details
Total words: 1,872
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
73% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 72.5% percentile 4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 10.7% 10.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 8.2% 8.2% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 9.1% 9.1% Red Herring Sitewide 0.7% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Tu Quoque Sitewide 0.2% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 20.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 17.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Bandwagon: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 2.2% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 0.0% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 6.9% Red Herring: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 0.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 1.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.2% Tu Quoque: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Horn Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst