Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,972 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andrew results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 52.2% saturation with 3,090 hits. Analysis detected 10,537 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,916 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.6% and a BS Rank of 84% (6,032 of 37,536 keywords). This Andrew is worse (more manipulative) than 83.90% of the peer group.
Andrew
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
84%Andrew (selected)6%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,916
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

84% percentile
025507510083.9% percentile
5.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 52.2%52.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 29.7%29.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.5%2.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Keyword 5.6%5.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 19.0%19.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Keyword 52.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 29.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 19.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 5.3%Slippery Slope: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 1.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Red Herring: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 0.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate