Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,701 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ancient Grains results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Appeal to Nature , and Hasty Generalization , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 384 hits . Analysis detected 3,007 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,103 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 17% (31,189 of 37,533 keywords). This Ancient Grains is better (less manipulative) than 83.10% of the peer group. Ancient Grains
Keyword details
Total words: 5,103
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
17% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 16.9% percentile 1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst