Keyword summary
12%2 analyzed articles/videos1,307 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ancient Dna results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Hasty Generalization, and Pessimism Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 7.2% saturation with 377 hits. Analysis detected 3,391 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,228 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 28% (27,146 of 37,536 keywords). This Ancient Dna is better (less manipulative) than 72.30% of the peer group.
Ancient Dna
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
28%Ancient Dna (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,228
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

28% percentile
025507510027.7% percentile
2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 7.1%7.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 5.3%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.5%Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.2%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate