Keyword summary
2% 1 analyzed article/video 675 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Analog Devices results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Halo Effect , and Straw Man , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 2.7% saturation with 54 hits . Analysis detected 278 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,025 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 6% (35,561 of 37,536 keywords). This Analog Devices is better (less manipulative) than 94.70% of the peer group. Analog Devices
Keyword details
Total words: 2,025
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
5% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.3% percentile 1.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Straw Man: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst