Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Analog results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Anecdotal, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 25% saturation with 488 hits. Analysis detected 2,574 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,950 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 37,372 keywords). This Analog is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Analog
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠0%Javian Hawkins1%
⁠0%Atlanta Falcons1%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
⁠0%Analog (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,950
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 25.0%25.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 11.5%11.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.4%3.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.9%0.9%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 6.8%6.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 10.2%10.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 15.7%15.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Keyword 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 25.0%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 15.7%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 1.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 4.6%Bandwagon: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Straw Man: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.9%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate