Keyword summary
76%2 analyzed articles/videos2,696 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amy Kremer results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 870 hits. Analysis detected 8,129 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,088 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 31% (23,882 of 34,426 keywords). This Amy Kremer is better (less manipulative) than 69.40% of the peer group.
Amy Kremer
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
31%Amy Kremer (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 8,088
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

31% percentile
025507510030.6% percentile
2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 10.8%10.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.5%8.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.5%6.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.4%6.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos