Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video766 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ami Daniel results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Optimism Bias, with False Dilemma as the most egregious example at 9% saturation with 207 hits. Analysis detected 1,784 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,298 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 59% (14,929 of 35,841 keywords). This Ami Daniel is worse (more manipulative) than 58.30% of the peer group.
Ami Daniel
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
59%Ami Daniel (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,298
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

58% percentile
025507510058.3% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.2%8.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.6%8.6%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 9.0%9.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.7%4.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 4.7%4.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 9.1%False Dilemma: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 1.5%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Circular Reasoning: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.1%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.4%Middle Ground: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos